I'm quickly growing bored with this idiocy now, so let me correct a few
things.
<sarcasm> Well done, old chap! Best way in to world to twist a view
around, is misquote the previous poster! </sarcasm>
In otherwords, anyone who read my message and saw your misquotes instantly
knows you for your true trolling self.
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, full name wrote:
> Paul Ogle <pogle1@umbc.edu> wrote:
> A casual reference is far from proof. Neither is a casual reference
If you'd read one of the three or four message posted in which all your
questions are answered, you wouldnt be able to say this. I believe you're
suffering from selective reading, in you can only read items that don't
directly prove you to be a moron.
> >
> ><snipped troll>
> >> 1. Why Daniel Blakemore likes to play with dolls.
> >1a. <snipped troll> They were models, <snipped troll>
Ah, I love the 'strategic snipping' practices of trolls.
>
> There is little difference between a figurine and a doll.
I'll let my baby cousin know that then. I'm sure she'll love to choke on
a model figurine instead of playing with a doll.
> >> 2. Why Daniel Blakemore pretended to be a girl for months on UseNet.
> >2a. Using his mom's account-wow, it is possible to use other people's
> >computers and accounts? What a concept...
>
> Misses the point. My reading is that he wanted others to believe that
> he was a girl. He posted for many months as "Christine" without
> including any other name. And, apparently, he was understood to be a
> female by fellow on-line gamers.
Maybe you missed the point in that no one cares? People assume false
identities on the net at all times anyways (::ahem:: full name) so quit
harping on one persons instance. Not like he legally represented himself
differntly, so its a null issue.
> >> 3. Why Daniel Blakemore's current name is that of a biblical eunuch.
>
> I do not know, but if I find out that Daniel Blakemore (conclusively)
> is his real name, I will withdraw that question. Still researching
> the issue.
Who gives a rats ass?
> >> 4. How Daniel Blakemore gets so much pleasure out of chastising
> >> others on UseNet (including retired military people who were wounded
> >> in combat).
> >4a. Because those others on Usenet were idiots? <snipped troll>
Ooops, more strategic snipping. Makes an art form of it, doesnt he?
> That is why Paul Ogle is still reading this thread, even after his
> Danny told him to ignore it. Paul Ogle needs to know. My extensive
> reading of the matter is that Daniel Blakemore's favorite victim is
> all class, that Daniel Blakemore derives great personal satisfaction
> out of taunting other UseNet users. Also possible is that the
> disturbance is more of a clan type thing. As some might already be
> aware, on the Internet there are such clans which get their jollies in
> various ways, like dominating a group, manipulating naive group
> members to revenge the clan's enemies, and plainly subjugating other
> UseNet users. Interesting stuff to me.
LOL no one's told me anything troll-boy, except you--when you mentioned
you were going to stop reading my posts. Guess that didnt happen--you
didnt want to be labeled a troll without a fair chance to prove yourself
to as many people as possible first, did you?
> >> 5. Why Daniel Blakemore was looking for "good FTP sites" in alt.fuck.
> >5a. Doesn't matter when one is past the age of consent.
>
> Makes for good conversation though.
For whom? I've not heard anything good coming from you. Daniel and I are
certainly having fun, but its somethink like talking to Eliza.
> >Why does full name not read my posts?
Now thats not even strategic snipping, thats a downright misquoted
statement in general. If you truly wanted people to take you seriously,
you'd not try and put words in their mouths.
> Usually, that would be because I prefer to converse with someone who
> acts like a grown-up. People who come on hurling insults at me when I
> post a very on-topic subject to the group deserve no attention at all
> from me. This reply is an exception.
I hurled no insults originally, I stated an opinion. If you can't learn to
handle others opinions, especially when seeking them on a sucbject, you're
in a lot of trouble little troll. If you don't want opinions, positive or
negative, dont post. But anything you do post is going to have people who
both like it, and dislike it. Unfortunately for you, the few people
who've posted any like for your concept have been driven off by your
blatant idiocy, and have admitted as much.
> --
> Real Timed Strategy Gaming
>
http://pages.prodigy.net/logicshaping
> mbender@satx.rr.com
>
> "A computer in every home - mine, all mine!"
Ho-hum, this is boring now. Come up with something new, keep entertaining
us.
|
3gvhukcfqqbhfdnp0rvmun1jf1197qis6@4ax.com...
Let the fun continue!