> >> The burden of proof is on Daniel Blakemore. > >Umm...guess again, <snipped troll>. He's referenced that already. > A casual reference is far from proof. Neither is a casual reference > to a casual reference, etc, etc, etc. I see no evidence. Everytime > Daniel Blakemore is asked for proof of his vicious, unsupported > accusation against a man who was wounded in combat in Vietnam and is > confined to a wheelchair, Daniel Blakemore's "evidence" is a casual > reference to a DD-214. Daniel Blakemore would have no problem > whatsoever posting someone's DD-214, if he had it, unless he were > concerned about fraud charges for falsifying the document. Or maybe > he is concerned about further cutting back on his Internet service. > Whatever the excuses, there remains no evidence of Daniel Blakemore's > vicious accusation.
You had the time to waste to look for the slightest bit of shit about me, so you can get off your fat, spreading arse and look up Erik Setzer. It isn't hard...there's even some current threads on the relevant forum.
But hey...you'd know this if you were arsed to check. or maybe you *do* know this, but don't want to admit it, as it undermines your whole stance.
> ><snipped troll> > >> 1. Why Daniel Blakemore likes to play with dolls. > >1a. <snipped troll> They were models, <snipped troll> > There is little difference between a figurine and a doll.
Try telling that to anyone who's ever bought and made a model kit, dimwit.
> >> 2. Why Daniel Blakemore pretended to be a girl for months on UseNet. > >2a. Using his mom's account-wow, it is possible to use other people's > >computers and accounts? What a concept... > Misses the point. My reading is that he wanted others to believe that > he was a girl. He posted for many months as "Christine" without > including any other name. And, apparently, he was understood to be a > female by fellow on-line gamers.
Proof that I *wanted* others to believe I was a girl? Proof that I was understood to be a girl by anyone there that I knew fairly well?
> >> 3. Why Daniel Blakemore's current name is that of a biblical eunuch. > I do not know, but if I find out that Daniel Blakemore (conclusively) > is his real name, I will withdraw that question. Still researching > the issue.
Here, I'll use my main account, dimwit.
> >> 4. How Daniel Blakemore gets so much pleasure out of chastising > >> others on UseNet (including retired military people who were wounded > >> in combat). > >4a. Because those others on Usenet were idiots? <snipped troll> > That is why Paul Ogle is still reading this thread, even after his > Danny told him to ignore it.
"Told"? Nah, *suggested*... Unless he wanted to be entertained by your idiotic antics.
> Paul Ogle needs to know. My extensive > reading of the matter
Hardly extensive if you're blinkered to several key facts.
> that Daniel Blakemore derives great personal satisfaction > out of taunting other UseNet users.
Nah, just f*ckwits like you
> Also possible is that the > disturbance is more of a clan type thing. As some might already be > aware, on the Internet there are such clans which get their jollies in > various ways, like dominating a group, manipulating naive group > members to revenge the clan's enemies, and plainly subjugating other > UseNet users. Interesting stuff to me.
I haven't got a clue where you got *that* shit from. What are you smoking, and why won't you share?
> >> 5. Why Daniel Blakemore was looking for "good FTP sites" in alt.fuck. > >5a. Doesn't matter when one is past the age of consent. > Makes for good conversation though.
So...you're admitting to being a troll?
> >Why does full name not read my posts? > Usually, that would be because I prefer to converse with someone who > acts like a grown-up.
Sez the blinkered hypocrite.
> People who come on hurling insults at me when I > post a very on-topic subject to the group deserve no attention at all > from me. This reply is an exception.
And all your other replies to me...?
-- Daniel Blakemore "He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself" - Tom Paine
|